Meddling princeling?

Tuesday 30 January 1649 was a cold day. As he prepared for his execution, Charles IThe king who sparked the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, which included the English Civil War. He was accused of tyranny by Parliament and ended up being executed for it. called for a second shirt, so that people should not think he was trembling out of fear. Under armed guard, he walked to his death in London. It took one stroke to cut off his head.

The king had paid the price for falling foul of ParliamentAn assembly of representatives, usually of an entire nation, that makes laws. . His attempt to rule without it resulted in the English Civil WarA war between people from the same country. , and defeat led to his trial and death.

Now Prince WilliamThe son of King Charles III, and the next in line to the British throne. is being criticised for becoming too involved in politics. Some believe it could have dire results for the Royal Family.

The cause of the furoreAn excited or angry reaction. It was originally an Italian word meaning "rage" or "madness". is a statement he made on Tuesday. In it he said: "I remain deeply concerned about the terrible human cost of the conflict in the Middle East since the HamasA militant Palestinian organisation, which has controlled the Gaza Strip since 2007. It is listed as a terrorist organisation in the UK. terrorist attack on 7 OctoberOn 7 October 2023, the Palestinian group Hamas, which controls Gaza, carried out a series of surprise attacks on Israel, killing more than 1,000 people and taking more than 200 hostages. ... I, like so many others, want to see an end to the fighting as soon as possible."

The statement made front-page headlines. Some approved of it, but others did not.

In the Daily Mail, Richard Kay said William was "close to entering a political and diplomaticNon-violent peacekeeping. Diplomatic means keeping good relations between the governments of different countries. minefield". Some people might think he was supporting the Palestinians against the Israelis.  

When King Charles was Prince of Wales, he was criticised for sending memos to government ministers on subjects such as the Iraq WarA long conflict that ran in Iraq from 2003 to 2011. It began with a US invasion to topple ruler Saddam Hussein. .¹ These were nicknamed the "black spider letters" because of his bad handwriting. As King, though, he has been careful to keep his opinions to himself.

But William's statement was welcomed by Britain's chief rabbiA Jewish religious leader.. And another Daily Mail article said William's statement was welcomed by 10 Downing Street10 Downing Street, in central London, has been the official home of the UK prime minister since 1735. .

The I Paper went further, with the headline "Royal diplomat: UK deploys Prince William to call for urgent Gaza ceasefireAn end to fighting - often temporary. ". It said the government "believes that the intervention will help boost Britain's diplomatic voice".

Should he keep out of politics?

Yes: It is a vital and well-established convention that members of the Royal Family keep their opinions to themselves. Failing to do so shows disrespect for democracy and jeopardises the family's future.

No: Many people, particularly among the younger generation, believe that there is no point to the Royal Family. By involving himself in worthwhile causes, William has a chance to change their minds.

Or... Members of the Royal Family have a right to their opinions just like everyone else. To deny them the freedom of speech that other people enjoy would be profoundly undemocratic.