Royal embroilment

The announcement from Buckingham PalaceThe home of Britain's king or queen. was serious: "It is with the deepest sorrow that we announce the death of Thomas Kingston... His death has come as a great shock to the whole family and we ask you to respect our privacy as we mourn his passing."

Unfortunately, when it comes to the Royal Family, privacy is the last thing on most people's minds.

Thomas Kingston was married to Lady Gabriella Windsor, the daughter of Prince and Princess Michael of KentPrince Michael of Kent was a first cousin of Queen Elizabeth II, as well as being a first cousin of Prince Philip's mother. . His death at 45 was completely unexpected.

Kingston worked in finance, but had previously been a diplomatAn official representing a country abroad. in BaghdadA city in Iraq built by the Abbasids. It remains the capital of Iraq today., where he was involved in the city's only Anglican church.

In 2004, a bombing at the church killed 22 people. Kingston had just entered the building, but was unharmed.

Kingston's death was one half of what the Daily Mail's front page called a "day of royal tragedy and drama". The other received the headline "William mysteriously misses his godfather's memorial".

This article concerned Prince William's absence from a memorial service for King Constantine of GreeceThe last king of Greece. He reigned from 1964 until the Greek monarchy was abolished in 1973. . William pulled out because of a "personal matter".

Without the royal element, nobody would find these stories at all interesting. Thomas Kingston's death was certainly sad, but the police say there was nothing suspicious about it.

As for the memorial service, Yahoo! News admitted: "All we really know for sure is that William did not attend."

The shortage of facts has not stopped people from spreading rumours. Was Kingston murdered? Had someone from Baghdad sought revenge?

There is nothing new about royal conspiracy theoriesTheories that explain world events by blaming shady groups of powerful people operating in secret. Some conspiracy theories have a basis in fact, but many more of them are completely invented. What is more, they often play on dangerous prejudices such as antisemitism. It's worth being especially cautious and critical when you come across accounts that ascribe enormous agency to small and secretive groups.. Some people claimed that Elizabeth IThe Tudor Queen of England from 1558 to 1603. was really a man.

Christopher HitchensA British author and journalist. wrote¹ that the popularity of royal stories made newspapers "fill page upon page with brainless twaddleSpeech or writing that is silly or not true.".

Should we be ashamed of ourselves?

Yes: This is gossip and nosiness at its worst. Death and memorial services should be treated with respect; both stories involve deep sadness, for which the Royal Family should only have our sympathy.

No: It is a basic human instinct to be interested in other people and there is no great harm in it. Speculating about the Royal Family is no different from speculating about our neighbours.  

Or... There is no smoke without fire. Some reports about the Royal Family that were initially thought baseless later turned out to be true - for example, the ones about William's parents' unhappy marriage.