• Reading Level 4-5
Citizenship | Form Time | Politics | Relationships and health

Energy drink ban for under-16s planned

Energy rush: Boys drink more energy drinks than girls. They are linked to headaches, irritability and being excluded from school.

Is the nanny state going too far? The UK government plans to protect teenagers from drinking too much caffeine. Some say there are already too many rules.

Comprehension quiz

  1. What is the meaning of the term “nanny state” in the context of this article?

    A: A government that provides free childcare for all citizens.

    B: A state where most of the population works in the childcare sector.

    C: A government that is criticised for introducing regulations that protect people from themselves, which some see as taking away freedoms.

    D: A government that passes laws related to the health of children.

  2. Which word is the closest synonym for vulnerable?

    A: Strong

    B: Exposed

    C: Aggressive

    D: Immune

  3. According to the article, which two of the following are potential health risks associated with consuming too much caffeine?

    A: Improved concentration

    B: Heart palpitations

    C: Obesity

    D: Headaches

  4. Besides the ban on energy drinks, identify two other government actions mentioned in the text that have been described as examples of the “nanny state”.

  5. The article states a key reason why the Prime Minister believes these health regulations are justified. Find and write down the phrase that describes what he hopes to secure for the NHS.

  6. In your own words, summarise the two opposing viewpoints in the article about the government’s regulations on public health.

Answers

Tap to reveal
1. C 2. B 3. B and D 4. Besides the ban on energy drinks, identify two other government actions mentioned in the text that have been described as examples of the "nanny state". 5. "The long-term future" 6. One viewpoint is that the government is justified in introducing these regulations to improve public health, prevent future sickness, and reduce the burden on the NHS. The opposing viewpoint is that these actions are an example of a "nanny state" that takes away personal freedoms.