"Pigs flew!" announced a newspaper from Rio de Janeiro. "A dream has turned into a nightmare," read another. One Argentinian daily dubbed its national players "knights of anguish".

It is the kind of heartache that only global football can inspire. But Argentina's historic loss to Saudi Arabia in the World Cup on Tuesday has pushed emotions to new heights.

After all, pundits had cast Argentina as a potential tournament champion, whilst Saudi Arabia's odds were 1,000 to 1. Not only that, but the country had won only one World Cup game since 1998.

Saudi Arabia seems set to continue surprising us, but perhaps our surprise is misplaced. The Kingdom has been slowly but surely routing a path to stardom for years now, particularly through global sports.

It invested £305m in buying the UK's premier league football team Newcastle United, £540m in developing local athletes, and offered iconic player Cristiano Ronaldo a £305m deal to join a Saudi Arabian football club.¹

But in other areas, Saudi Arabia rarely gets good press. The country has executed 17 men in the past two weeks alone and routinely ranks as the "worst of the worst" in surveys of civil and political rights. Journalists and dissidentsPeople who publicly disagree with or criticise an authority or government, especially an oppressive one. face torture, persecution, exileForced out of one's country, often as a form of punishment. and possible murder. It is involved in a war in YemenThe poorest country in the Gulf region is in the midst of a humanitarian crisis. .

Some are concerned about Saudi Arabia's win, saying that it is symbolic of their speedy growth on the international stage. But others point out the hypocrisySaying something is bad, but also taking part in it yourself. : none of the other competitors have a very proud history either.

Argentina, for example, has been criticised for consistent violence against women, police abuse, and poor prison conditions. Potential champion Brazil is accused of corruptionWhen someone abuses their power for personal gain. It often involves bribery. , torture and persecution. Some say the focus on Middle Eastern countries is mere prejudice.

Yes: It is clear that the country is developing rapidly, and we could clearly gain from deepening our partnerships with it. Nowhere is perfect, and it is hypocritical to refuse to work with Saudi Arabia whilst disregarding the historic abuses of other global powers.

No: Supporting the economic development of Saudi Arabia would make us complicit in human rights abuses. Many nations have put sanctions in place against Russia, for example, so why work with another country involved in a war?

Or... It depends how we interpret "embracing" Saudi Arabia. It has proven that it will continue to grow on the world stage, so it is clearly a permanent presence regardless of whether or not we actively support the country. There are ways to have stable alliances without supporting everything a nation does.