Scientists discover a new force of nature
Is it exciting to realise how little we really know? Yesterday, the news broke that a misbehaving particle might overturn our current understanding of physics, forces and matter itself.
It was just a “tiny wobble.” But it might upend what we thought were the laws of nature.
Yesterday, the world learned that scientists outside Chicago made the jaw-dropping discovery that muons — dense, unstable particles of matter nicknamed “fat electrons” — move in a way that defies physics.
It could mark the discovery of a fifth fundamental force, one which has previously eluded scientific attention. “It potentially points to a future with new laws of physics, new particles and a new force which we have not seen to date,” said physicist Mark Lancaster.
The findings might disrupt our confidence in scientific knowledge. Humanity has untangled climate systems and cloned the cells that make up living things. We have reached the tallest peaks and deepest pits. We have mapped out faraway planets and charted long-dead stars.
And yet, for all our efforts, the massive bulk of knowledge remains out of reach. Astronomers believe only 4.9% of the universe is made from normal matter – those atoms that make up everything from houmous, hats and human beings to celestial bodies. We know almost nothing about the remaining 95.1%. “Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think,” said pioneering quantum physicist Werner Heisenberg.
Naturalists estimate that 82% of animals and plants on Earth are unidentified, plus an untold number of microorganisms. Biologists do not fully understand why we cry, laugh, itch, sleep and dream.
Scientists can never be certain. Stephen Hawking nicknamed quantum physics “dreams that stuff is made of.” A scientific discovery is defined as having a one in 3.5 million chance of being a fluke: a slim margin of error, but a chance nonetheless.
All of these are known unknowns, flaws in our knowledge that we are aware of. But there might also be myriad unknown unknowns, of which we have no inkling whatsoever.
Many find these terrifying. Stable knowledge powers human society. An engineer building a car needs to know its engine will function safely, while a pharmacist must know that a medicine will cure rather than harm a patient. If the laws of nature change, we lose this certainty, with potentially negative side effects.
But there is another perspective. A world in which everything is known threatens to be stale and boring. And it is the holes in our knowledge that push us to make new discoveries. The modernist poet Wallace Stevens wrote: “it is the unknown that excites the ardour of scholars, who in the known alone would shrivel up with boredom.”
The unknown also fires our imagination. Many of the greatest achievements of human culture, from the Ancient Egyptian pyramids to Hieronymus Bosch’s paintings of heavens and hells, speculate on life after death.
And the objects of our imagination can preempt knowledge, and perhaps influence later discoveries. The Czech dramatist Karel Čapek invented the robot in a 1920 play, while American science fiction writer Arthur C Clarke accurately described communications satellites in 1945, 13 years before the first satellite orbited Earth. Long-term speculation about the existence of parallel universes now finds scientific expression in the many-worlds theory of quantum mechanics.
Is it exciting to realise how little we really know?
Touching the void
Undoubtedly, say some. A world unknown opens minds and fuels the imagination. Life is more interesting when we are adrift on a sea of possibility, rather than masters of a measured, proscribed existence. Besides, It is our ignorance that drives us to make discoveries in the first place. The quest for understanding is often more exciting than the knowledge itself.
Absolutely not, say others. The unknown can be scary and bewildering, and it is in the interest of our happiness to eliminate as much of it as possible. Human history is a tale of increased knowledge leading to greater security, rights and prosperity. And without a firm awareness of the laws of nature, we cannot guarantee that developments in medicine and technology will work safely.
- What branch of science do you think is most important?
- Is scientific knowledge worth pursuing for its own sake, or should it always have a practical purpose?
- You are a TV news reporter. Choose five questions you would ask a Fermilab scientist about their discovery, then answer the questions.
- In pairs, research a historical scientific discovery that caused controversy. Present the story of the discovery and the debate surrounding it to the class.
Some People Say...
“To know that we know what we know, and to know that we do not know what we do not know: that is true knowledge”Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 — 1543), Polish mathematician and astronomer
What do you think?
Q & A
- What do we know?
- Contemporary science agrees that matter is composed of minuscule particles. Although the philosophical concept of the atom stretches back to Ancient Greece, it was the 19th Century English chemist John Dalton who concluded that the atom was a physical particle. Soon after, physicists discovered that the atom could be divided into further units. The development of quantum mechanics has seen 31 such fundamental particles developed, including quarks, electrons and muons.
- What do we not know?
- There remain numerous unknowns in particle physics. An estimated 26.8% of the universe comprises dark matter — invisible particles that never turn into other sorts of matter — but we do not know what these particles actually are. A further 68.3% of the universe remains a complete mystery. Even things held scientifically true provoke differing responses among scientists. A 2013 conference poll on quantum mechanics, for instance, found little agreement in preferred interpretation of the field.
- Further experiments must be performed before Fermilab findings can be declared a discovery. They currently have a one in 40,000 chance of being coincidental, short of the one in 3.5 million chance required.
- Particles of matter
- The tiny, invisible units of matter that comprise the substance of the world.
- A subatomic particle, traditionally represented as circling an atom’s core. Electricity is created by pulling electrons from atoms.
- Fundamental force
- Interactions or movements that cannot be reduced to further components. Prior to yesterday, these comprised gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force.
- Celestial bodies
- The objects that fill the universe, including planets, stars, moons, meteoroids, asteroids, comets and gas clouds.
- Known unknowns
- A phrase popularised by former US Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld in a 2002 speech before the Iraq War.
- A slight hint or suspicion, descended from the Middle English verb inkle meaning “to utter in an undertone”.
- A flaming enthusiasm or passion, descended from the Latin ardere “to burn”.
- Quantum mechanics
- The branch of physics that deals with very small units of matter, developed at the start of the 20th Century,