NATO alliance is brain dead, says Macron
Is NATO obsolete? President Macron of France has described it as “brain dead”, stressing what he sees as waning commitment to the transatlantic alliance by its main guarantor, the USA.
It has been dubbed the most successful military alliance in history. But today NATO is in jeopardy. Why? President Donald Trump.
Consisting of 29 states (all European except the US and Canada), NATO’s key function is to protect its members from war. If one nation is attacked, all others must come to its defence. The US is NATO’s richest and mightiest member, and the alliance has long relied on American firepower.
Yesterday, French President Macron warned European members that they could no longer rely on the US to defend the alliance, established at the start of the Cold War to bolster Western European and North American security.
Trump has repeatedly accused European leaders of reneging on their own defence spending commitments; ripping off the US in the process. “NATO countries must pay MORE, the United States must pay LESS. Very Unfair!” he tweeted last year.
On this issue, he has a point. NATO members are expected to spend at least 2% of their GDP on defence, but in 2017 only five did. The US is the biggest contributor and currently spends 3.5%.
Is NATO obsolete?
US and them
Its days are numbered, some respond. NATO is a relic: designed to counter a Communist danger that no longer exists, and is too reliant on the US. What’s more, the nature of conflict has changed. Cyber attacks and terrorism are now the West’s major threats — which NATO is ill-equipped to deal with.
NATO is still relevant, others respond. New nations want to join and, as a deterrent, it has been crucial in limiting Russian expansion in Eastern Europe. Furthermore, it is not just about war. The group promotes democracy, liberal values and the rule of law: ideals that are more crucial than ever.
- Is the “special relationship” between the US and the UK dead?
- The main purpose of NATO is to prevent a major war breaking out in Europe. Overall, do you think war is becoming more or less likely in the world in general? Think of three reasons why it is, and three reasons why it is not. Which side do you agree with?
Some People Say...
“We are going to put America first, and we are going to make America great again.”President Donald Trump
What do you think?
Q & A
- What do we know?
- Since the formation of NATO in 1949, member states have only had to activate the mutual defence protocol once. This was to defend the US following the 9/11 attacks. This led to NATO forces joining the US in their invasion of Afghanistan. Furthermore, NATO countries also sided with the US-led fight against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.
- What do we not know?
- How solid the future of NATO is. During Trump’s election campaign, he slammed the organisation as “obsolete”, however he has since gone back on that comment. Kay Bailey Hutchison, the US ambassador to NATO, has been more positive. Last week, she claimed that the “major overall theme” of today’s summit was “NATO’s strength and unity.”
- Founded in 1949 to promote peace following World War Two. NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.
- 29 states
- The alliance was founded by 12 states, which included the UK, France and the US. Germany joined in 1955, and the most recent addition was Montenegro in 2017.
- Support, strengthen.
- Going back on an agreement.
- These were the US, Britain, Greece, Poland and Estonia.