Beeline Reader (learn more) uses subtle colour gradients to help you read more quickly and efficiently.
Democracy in England: functional or fictional?
Mikey Stradling, West Buckland School
Runner-up, Political Journalist of the Year
It’s no secret that Britain is democratic. A “constitutional monarchy.” It has been since the 1630s, but democracy might not be all it is made out to be.
A democracy is intended to empower everyone with the right to vote to make change in a state or nation. However, over the past few years, under one particular prime minister, many changes were made to Britain, against the will of the public: The constant rule changes, the multiple lockdowns, the government’s ignorance toward health officials, the health officials’ ignorance toward the people; the Track and Trace blunder.
The government allocated a budget of £37 Billion towards an overzealous application that caused the “Pingdemic”. That much money could easily be used to house all of those living in shelters or on the streets, or to pay off this year’s student debt, with money to spare. More than 274,000 people are homeless in England right now, including 126,000 children, and they choose to create a few lines of code that will not only cause even more stress and inconvenience, but waste taxpayers’ money. The public had no choice in the matter. It was up to the people with actual power over what happens in the country. Sound like democracy?
The National Health Service has been experiencing brutal pay cuts from our countries current management. In Devon alone, our services will be underfunded by £681 million in 2022/23 – the equivalent of 19,100 nurses, 5700 GPs, and 600 MRI machines. This is a service that helps the people, the voters, yet still they abandon it. The total funds cut over the entire country are more like £400 million from just 2018. What if the people could vote on such?
A big part of society is law. All are equal in the eyes of the law, apparently. So, when the government were making new laws, which the people had no control over, what were they doing? They had parties. Sixteen gatherings were held at 10 Downing Street during the chaos of the pandemic, many of which will not be investigated by police. The queen was seated alone during Prince Phillip’s funeral, due to COVID-19 restrictions set by Boris Johnson, yet just the night before, the Conservative government held another two parties. Alongside that, the Queen has sovereign immunity, meaning that “Queen Elizabeth ‘cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution’”She also holds diplomatic immunity, meaning she can escape the law in most countries. She is the law. That does not seem very fair, does it? Ah, the shortcomings of democracy, not being democratic.
Cite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.