Should we learn to live with less? The world is still hooked on economic growth. But some believe endless growth is impossible, and it is time to start thinking about shrinking.
Endless growth is killing us, COP27 warned
Should we learn to live with less? The world is still hooked on economic growth. But some believe endless growth is impossible, and it is time to start thinking about shrinking.
Growing pains
"New jobs and clean growth". That was the rallying cry of British prime minister Rishi Sunak as he arrived at the COP27The 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as the Conference of the Parties (COP). climate summit in Egypt.
But at the summit Sunak will come up against supporters of degrowth: the plan for economic shrinking whose popularity is perhaps the only thing growing.
The degrowth movement began in the 1970s, but it has become more popular in recent years. The argument is simple. There can be no growth without constantly increasing production and consumption. And production requires energy, while consumption produces waste - two of the things that are doing most to kill the planet.
That is why they think it is simply impossible to keep the economy growing forever. Sooner or later, it runs into natural constraints.
Until now, the global community has focused on "sustainable development": the idea that countries should keep seeking growth, but do so in ways that do not harm the planet.
The degrowth movement claims this is impossible. Growth is self-destructive. Instead, the richest countries should be encouraged to shrink their own economies and clamp down on consumption.
Opponents think this would be madness. They point out that economic shrinking has tended to lead to worse environmental outcomes, as green agendas get shelved in favour of managing the problems caused by recessionsPeriods of economic decline. A recession occurs when a country's Gross Domestic Product falls for six months in a row. .
And they argue economic growth has always led to higher living standards. Degrowth would mean making people's lives worse.1
But degrowthers believe this approach lacks imagination. Simply having more things, they argue, does not necessarily mean a higher standard of living. And we can achieve degrowth in ways that improve quality of life: encouraging people to work fewer hours, for example.
Yes: Degrowth is the only way of saving the climate, and the best way of improving living standards. It means working less, keeping things for longer, and having more time to enjoy life.
No: Degrowth is a recipe for human suffering. It means unemployment, poverty and misery, and it would strand the world's poorest in eternal underdevelopment.
Or... We might have no choice. Economic growth has already slowed almost to a stop around the world. The environment simply is not letting us grow any more. We need to adapt to this reality.
Should we learn to live with less?
Keywords
COP27 - The 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as the Conference of the Parties (COP).
Recessions - Periods of economic decline. A recession occurs when a country's Gross Domestic Product falls for six months in a row.
Endless growth is killing us, COP27 warned
Glossary
COP27 - The 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as the Conference of the Parties (COP).
Recessions - Periods of economic decline. A recession occurs when a country’s Gross Domestic Product falls for six months in a row.